A Mind is a Terrible Thing

26 March 2006

Poem: “Blow-flies”

Filed under: Poetry, Writing — Becca @ 11:55 pm

Another poem.  And you folks wondered what I was doing with myself all that time in India?


Blow-flies

Trouble and strife arrive
not singly
nor in pairs
but always in great buzzing
black swarms

They blot out the sun
bringing dank chill and gloom
and having discovered
fertile, fecund soil
within my heart
lay tiny glistening eggs
like dark pearls

And when these hatch
the blind maggots
burrow deep
seeking not air and freedom
but to feed upon
the moist, tender flesh
of my beating core

I could attempt
to brush them away
or stomp them flat, but
their unique venom
kills first
any desire to live
without them

- Becca Morn, March 2006


Ooops!

Filed under: Just stuff — Becca @ 12:08 am

Sorry folks — I just realized tonight that I hadn’t had comments turned back on for any of my posts since returning from India.  Should be all better now.

- Becca

Poem: “The Smithy”

Filed under: Poetry, Spirituality, Writing — Becca @ 12:01 am

Another poem for you this evening, my dear occasional Imaginary Reader


The Smithy

Some days I am the Hammer
but far more often
I feel like the Anvil

Only when
I am very lucky
do I get to be
the glowing-hot iron ingot
shaped by the Blacksmith
between the Hammer
and Anvil

On the other hand
nobody ever said
the experience
was easy
or fun
for the ingot

- (c) Rebecca Morn, 2006


24 March 2006

Bush shuns Patriot Act requirement – The Boston Globe

Filed under: Commentary, News, Politics — Becca @ 3:25 pm

President Bush today signed into law a bill that, in a signing statement, he says dissolves Congress, makes the Judiciary a sub-branch under the Unitary Executive, and authorizes the President to control both State and territorial governments directly.

Even though the bill in question merely declared next August to be "National Sleep Disorder Awareness Month," the President’s signing statement alleges that it was the intent of Congress to confer to the Executive the power to change federal, state, and local governments at will.  It further claims that no judicial review is necessary because the White House counsel and Attorney General have both issued memoranda in support of the President’s interpretation, and also since the law’s measures were imposed retroactively, any Supreme Court decision is now subject to the President’s approval.

The Democratic Party leadership could not be reached for comment, but Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-Connecticut) responded, "This is a bold and decisive move by the President in response to the threat of terrorism, and I for one intend to support him whole-heartedly and without reservation.  The American people should, too."

Okay… that was satire folks.  Unfortunately, the truth of the matter is that the President of the United States has decided that regardless what laws Congress passes and regardless what the courts say is legal or illegal, he gets to do whatever he wants.  All he has to do is invoke the magic words "National Security" — and poof!  A requirement to report back to Congress on how the renewed Patriot Act is being used is ignored.  Better still, it was the White House that arrogated to itself the right to interpret the law — not any court.

I’m sorry, but that’s it.  We’re essentially done here.  Congress and the Judiciary are now officially irrelevant.  And we are now officially in a dictatorship.

I wonder if any of the Republicans have noticed…

Boston Globe:
Bush shuns Patriot Act requirement – The Boston Globe Bush
shuns Patriot Act requirement In addendum to law, he says oversight rules are not binding

By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | March 24, 2006 WASHINGTON — When President Bush signed the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act this month, he included an addendum saying that he did not feel obliged to obey requirements that he inform Congress about how the FBI was using the act’s expanded police powers.

The bill contained several oversight provisions intended to make sure the FBI did not abuse the special terrorism-related powers to search homes and secretly seize papers. The provisions require Justice Department officials to keep closer track of how often the FBI uses the new powers and in what type of situations. Under the law, the administration would have to provide the information to Congress by certain dates.

Bush signed the bill with fanfare at a White House ceremony March 9, calling it ”a piece of legislation that’s vital to win the war on terror and to protect the American people." But after the reporters and guests had left, the White House quietly issued a ‘’signing statement," an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law.

In the statement, Bush said that he did not consider himself bound to tell Congress how the Patriot Act powers were being used and that, despite the law’s requirements, he could withhold the information if he decided that disclosure would ”impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative process of the executive, or the performance of the executive’s constitutional duties." Bush wrote: ”The executive branch shall construe the provisions . . . that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch . . . in a manner consistent with the president’s constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold information . . . "

22 March 2006

Answer: At least 3 1/2 more years in the quagmire…

Filed under: Commentary, News — Becca @ 10:45 pm

Froomkin (the only guy worth reading in the WaPo anymore) reports:

News Between the Lines Bush made the most news with two offhand, possibly even accidental admissions amid the familiar and increasingly ineffective talking points that took up most of the hour. White House Briefing News Between the Lines Incredibly Optimistic War Is Peace A Rebellion

When asked if American forces will ever completely leave Iraq, Bush replied: "That, of course, is an objective, and that will be decided by future presidents and future governments of Iraq."

You heard him folks.  Future presidents means January 2009 at the soonest — assuming this guy doesn’t decide the Executive Branch also has the right to suspend elections and/or to repeal the Constitutional Amendment limiting any President to two terms.

20 March 2006

Aren’t long-term memory problems indicative of heart troubles?

Filed under: Commentary, News — Becca @ 2:47 pm

Reuters AlertNet – Cheney says he won’t resign, will serve out term

WASHINGTON, March 19 (Reuters) – Vice President Dick Cheney, a lightning rod for criticism about administration policies, on Sunday rejected the notion of resigning and said he would serve out his term. "I made sure both in 2000 and 2004 that the president had other options. I mean, I didn’t ask for this job. I didn’t campaign for it. I got drafted," Cheney said on CBS television’s "Face The Nation."

The reason I mention this is because Cheney himself ran the Bush campaign’s VP selection committee.  Does that even remotely sound like "drafted" to any of you out there?

Poem: “Layers”

Filed under: Poetry, Writing — Becca @ 1:49 pm

Another poem for you, my dear Imaginary Readers:


Layers

I scratch the edge
of the world-canvas
find what I thought
was immutable physicality
is nothing more than a thin veneer
a façade

Base wood is often covered
with a thin layer of something
more fine, more rare
to make it seem better than it is

Here, the roles are reversed
the ordinary, a micron-thin
coating to conceal
the extra-ordinary
the super-natural

I do not quite know
what to make of this insight
for it seems incommunicable
irrelevant to the layer
I just peeled back

One step removed from that coating of Real
like oil floating atop water
even if you stir it with your hand
vigorously
eventually the oil separates
returns to the top
yet for a small while
you can have both in equal measure

It always returns
to equilibrium

- (c) Rebecca Morn, 7 March 2006


Ah, this explains a lot…

Filed under: Commentary, Just stuff, News — Becca @ 11:31 am

TheStar.com – How to spot a baby conservative

How to spot a baby conservative
Whiny children, claims a new study, tend to grow up rigid and traditional. Future liberals, on the other hand …

Remember the whiny, insecure kid in nursery school, the one who always thought everyone was out to get him, and was always running to the teacher with complaints? Chances are he grew up to be a conservative.

At least, he did if he was one of 95 kids from the Berkeley area that social scientists have been tracking for the last 20 years. The confident, resilient, self-reliant kids mostly grew up to be liberals.

The study from the Journal of Research Into Personality isn’t going to make the UC Berkeley professor who published it any friends on the right. Similar conclusions a few years ago from another academic saw him excoriated on right-wing blogs, and even led to a Congressional investigation into his research funding. But the new results are worth a look.

In the 1960s Jack Block and his wife and fellow professor Jeanne Block (now deceased) began tracking more than 100 nursery school kids as part of a general study of personality. The kids’ personalities were rated at the time by teachers and assistants who had known them for months. There’s no reason to think political bias skewed the ratings — the investigators were not looking at political orientation back then. Even if they had been, it’s unlikely that 3- and 4-year-olds would have had much idea about their political leanings.

A few decades later, Block followed up with more surveys, looking again at personality, and this time at politics, too. The whiny kids tended to grow up conservative, and turned into rigid young adults who hewed closely to traditional gender roles and were uncomfortable with ambiguity.

The confident kids turned out liberal and were still hanging loose, turning into bright, non-conforming adults with wide interests. The girls were still outgoing, but the young men tended to turn a little introspective.

Very interesting…  the rest of the article is at the link above.

17 March 2006

I’m here, not to worry (and a poem)

Filed under: Just stuff, Philosophy and Religion, Poetry, Sri Kaleshwar Swami — Becca @ 12:02 am

I apologize, those of my Imaginary Readers, who might still be haunting this place despite my long absence.  Before leaving, I was given all kinds of warnings about the dangers of drinking unfiltered water or eating certain foods.

In India, I was fine.  No problems whatsoever.

This changed the day after I got back home.  Since then, I’ve been sick as the proverbial dog, and I have spent entirely too much time reaquainting myself with our bathroom.

I promise a much longer accounting of my adventures in India, both in Bangalore and at Kaleshwar’s ashram in Penukonda, to be posted at some future date.  Also, I might as well break the news here and now: I am going back in June, to attend Kaleshwar’s one year university program.  We’re selling our house, putting our stuff in storage — and we’ve already bought an apartment at the ashram.  (Nothing says one is serious like a real estate investment, eh?)  Unlike this last trip though, I am going to try to get some moderately regular Internet access set up, and although I won’t be able to post daily, I should be able to manage weekly blog posts.

What I won’t be able to do — nor am I inclined to continue — is my political commentary, at least not to any huge degree.  If you’ve visited here much at all, you know how I feel about the current U.S. government.  The GOP is a hopelessly corrupt and criminal political party basically so wrapped up in keeping power and making rich people richer, they don’t care what they destroy.  As for Bush and his administration?  Both incompetent and pathologically megalomaniacal.  In fact, probably the only thing that’s kept us from total destruction at this point so far is the fact that they’re so breathtakingly incompetent.

Kinda like the way Doctor Smith never quite managed to destroy the Jupiter 2, on "Lost in Space."  Or maybe a more apt analogy would be Gilligan, only hopped up and all sociopathic on a stash of crystal meth that floated into the island lagoon one shipwrecked day.  That’s Bush for ya.

Anyway, I had some really remarkable experiences.  B’lore, as we call it, was a loud, crowded, interestingly-aroma’d city — but a lot of fun, especially once I got the hang of the shopping thing.  And the ashram… well, I’ve never been anyplace more peaceful and serene.  If anything, I’m having severe adjustment problems, being back — especially as I look forward to three months of packing and getting our house ready for sale.

Now then, I promised you folks a poem, and I keep my word.  This is one I wrote at the ashram, and with utmost honesty here, I have NO idea where it came from.  I just sat down one night, and this thing practically wrote itself.


Signal Fire

Light the signal fire, my friend
for the armies are on the march

Dust raised by tens of thousands
of tattered leather boots
creates inadvertent prophecy for us
in a blood-red sunset

They bring spears
war-elephants and chariots
battle-wagons and battering rams
siege engines to fling diseased corpses
over the parapets

Light the signal fire
for though these walls are high
and have never before been breached
nothing stands for an eternity

Were their generals to order
the men to turn aside
still, mortar crumbles
rain, ice and wind
merely taking a little longer while
than hurled boulders

You say we shall withstand the armies
and keep our walls in good repair
What happens when you are gone
and your sons, and their sons after them
leaving none to remember
in the chasm of time
why the walls were ever built
in the first place?

Eventually, inevitably
they will fall
We are but temporary stewards

Yet light the signal fire, I say
for this is our place
our duty, in this time
to fight and stand true
to die, if that is our fate

What comes after
is not our concern

Light the signal fire
or, if you will not do it
give me the torch

- (c) 2006, Rebecca Morn

16 March 2006

A moment of advertising Zen

Filed under: Just stuff — Becca @ 10:27 pm

I know it’s just a commercial for Sony’s line of Bravia televisions…but something about this is just so very restful and serene.  Give it a watch

http://www.bravia-advert.com/commercial/braviaextcommhigh.html

Note:  Seems to require IE to launch, and Quicktime to play.  I couldn’t get it to run in a normal Firefox tab, but it was fine when I had it in an IE tab.

Next Page »